Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 1293 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $80.42 vs $99.8
- Up to 15% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11400 - $0.67 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 140 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
133
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13910 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
84%
Price, €
€110.78
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for €110.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13909 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |