Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $80.42 vs $90.67
- Up to 9% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-10600KF - $0.52 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 178 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
171
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18190 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
91%
Price, €
€100.64
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for €100.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |