Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 600 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $80.42 vs $98.86
- Up to 7% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i3-9100F - $1.03 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 99 vs 87 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
87
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Buy for €109.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |