Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100 is 35 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $80.42 vs $80.43
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 104 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.86 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
103
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
98%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13352 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
104
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.28
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13352 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |