Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2559 days newer than Core i3-560.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-560 - 259 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 73 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
234
90.34749034749035%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Single-Core
443
37.928082191780824%
Multi-Core
932
16.08560579910252%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |