Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100 is 1587 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $80.42 vs $89.19
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 37% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 227 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 19% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.44 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 60 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
166
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
81%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17203 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |