Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1293 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $62.24 vs $80.42
- Up to 23% better value when playing Control than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.34 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15376 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15375 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |