Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 165 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen 5 2400G - 104 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $80.42 vs $98.71
- Up to 23% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen 5 2400G - $0.86 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
104
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18805 minutes ago
Buy for €109.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18805 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |