Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3047 days newer than Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 75% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-5820K - 579 vs 330 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
579
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€628.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €628.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raphael | Codename | Haswell E |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 140 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |