Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1457 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 61% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-9400F - 579 vs 360 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-9400F
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $85.22 vs $604.62
- Up to 78% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.26 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
579
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
22%
Price, €
€671.13
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 365 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
360
62%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €94.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 366 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raphael | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |