Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Core i3-7350K - 166 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 94% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.21 vs $3.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 60 vs 120 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
152
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raphael | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 60 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |