Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 17% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-3220 - 590 vs 506 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $67.25 vs $504.51
- Up to 84% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.15 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
590
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
16%
Price, €
€560.01
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €560.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
506
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raphael | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 55 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |