Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 31% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-7100 - 136 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $47.53 vs $357.97
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 51 vs 170 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €397.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74996 minutes ago
Buy for €52.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74997 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
42.443839346494215%
Multi-Core
2440
12.647074068314934%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raphael | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
170 W | TDP | 51 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |