Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1478 days newer than Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 35% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2500X - 136 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€424.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €424.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2500X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raphael | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |