Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 139 vs 117 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 120 vs 170 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€315.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €315.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raphael | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 120 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |