Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7845HX is 3089 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
- Performs up to 33% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-4160T - 130 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX - 35 vs 55 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Dragon Range | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FL1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Radeon 610M | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
