Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 748 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900X - 146 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $263.43 vs $460.65
- Up to 48% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900X - $2.0 vs $3.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 105 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900X - 32 vs 20 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€292.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €292.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Buy for €511.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Vermeer | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |