Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2076 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 7% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron 3205U - 191 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€299.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €299.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5935 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | Intel Celeron 3205U |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 15.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |