Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2380 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 25% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-4150T - 121 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-4150T - $1.76 vs $1.84 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $160.82 vs $191.57
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€212.64
83%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €212.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8718 minutes ago
Buy for €178.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8717 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Core i3-4150T |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Vermeer | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |