Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 947 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 50% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G4900 - 219 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $49.74 vs $191.57
- Up to 61% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 9 5900X - $0.38 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €212.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3867 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
146
66%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3867 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |