Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900 is 1251 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 215 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5900 - 32 vs 24 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
201
93.48837209302326%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€507.23
100%
Buy for €507.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
57.06627680311891%
Multi-Core
7539
76.42169285352254%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vermeer | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |