Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2592 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 17% better in Starfield than Core i5-4670S - 63 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $40.41 vs $215.7
- Up to 78% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.83 vs $3.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.8/FPS
21.842105263157897%
Price, €
€239.43
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €239.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1568 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
54
85.71428571428571%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €44.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1561 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1151
66.57027183342973%
Multi-Core
3254
32.442671984047855%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |