Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 3101 days newer than Core i5-2400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 40% better in Starfield than Core i5-2400 - 63 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
63
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€300.3
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €300.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
554
32.72297696396929%
Multi-Core
1607
16.170255584624673%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |