Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 696 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 13% better in HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 150 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $274.2 vs $599.06
- Up to 59% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.83 vs $4.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 32 vs 24 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€304.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €304.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76750 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
88.66666666666667%
Value, €/FPS
€4.5/FPS
40.666666666666664%
Price, €
€664.96
45%
Buy for €664.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76751 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
69.16715888954519%
Multi-Core
7539
75.8603340712417%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |