Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2260 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 23% better in New World than FX-6350 - 121 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $73.11 vs $270.54
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €300.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |