Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1650 days newer than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 8% better in Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 - 116 vs 107 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |