Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is 648 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 179 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 15 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |