Buy on Amazon
€206.96
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 4438 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 41% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-3930K - 157 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - $186.45 vs $204.73
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G 8-Core, 16-Thread Desktop Processor
Buy for €206.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-3930K Hexa-Core Processor 3.2 Ghz 12 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73930K
Buy for €227.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 8700G
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Single-Core
606
22.561429635145196%
Multi-Core
2961
20.800842992623814%
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Not Available | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
4 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon 780M | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.