Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 3906 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6350 - 216 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen 7 8700G - $73.11 vs $186.44
- Up to 50% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 8700G - $0.48 vs $0.96 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €206.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
168
77.77777777777779%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
4 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon 780M | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |