Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 12% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 246 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 85 vs 120 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
926
34.056638470025746%
Multi-Core
3996
26.337991036119167%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Raphael | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 85 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
