Buy on Amazon
€156.64
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $449
Availability
MSRP in USD: $449
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 5800X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 5800X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 790 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 5800X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $141.12 vs $350.97
- Up to 57% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900 - $1.07 vs $2.48 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 5800X - 157 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 7 5800X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€156.64
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for €156.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-13900 Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for €389.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 7 5800X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vermeer | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.