Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 668 days newer than Ryzen 7 4800HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 7 4800HS - 258 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS - 24 vs 16 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€221.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €221.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |