Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 435 days newer than Ryzen 7 4800HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 7 4800HS - 145 vs 129 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€185.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €185.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |