Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 4800HS is 460 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
- Performs up to 1% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 217 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS - 24 vs 16 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
215
99%
Value, €/FPS
€2.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€608.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5047 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Renoir | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |