Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 21% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8300 - 182 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800X - $77.55 vs $143.31
- Up to 36% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 3800X - $0.57 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
64.0449438202247%
Price, €
€159.07
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €159.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
151
82.96703296703298%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |