Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 460 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 207% better in League of Legends than Celeron G4900 - 212 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing League of Legends than Celeron G4900 - $0.78 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $49.74 vs $149.89
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€166.38
33%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €166.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |