Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1589 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 8% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron 3205U - 124 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€166.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €166.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Celeron 3205U |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 15.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |