Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1356 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 7 2700 - 245 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $29.24 vs $135.27
- Up to 80% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 7 2700 - $0.13 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
245
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |