Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 252 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $135.27 vs $197.42
- Up to 31% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.77 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 3 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 197 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 24 vs 16 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
196
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€150.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
69%
Price, €
€219.14
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |