Buy on Amazon
€142.85
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 585 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $128.69 vs $355.32
- Up to 61% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.67 vs $1.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 9% better in Borderlands 3 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 232 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 32 vs 16 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
213
91.8103448275862%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€142.85
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler - YD2700BBAFBOX
Buy for €142.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2505 minutes ago
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
39.411764705882355%
Price, €
€394.41
36%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core, 32-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for €394.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2507 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
65.3755868544601%
Multi-Core
5489
51.31824981301422%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Matisse |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.