Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2004 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8350 - 200 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8350 - $0.75 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€150.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18130 minutes ago
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |