Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1800X is 397 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
- Performs up to 8% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G4900 - 258 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1800X - $39.15 vs $201.08
- Up to 79% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 7 1800X - $0.18 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1800X - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
20.689655172413794%
Price, €
€223.2
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €223.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
240
93.02325581395348%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
54.46507515473032%
Multi-Core
1051
18.326068003487357%
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |