Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1800X is 58 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Celeron G3930 - 182 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1800X - $64.34 vs $201.08
- Up to 67% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen 7 1800X - $0.4 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1800X - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
32.520325203252035%
Price, €
€223.2
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €223.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4917 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
177
97.25274725274726%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
53.7577365163572%
Multi-Core
1043
18.186573670444638%
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |