Buy on Amazon
€158.27
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 2244 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-2500K - 120 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $142.59 vs $219.35
- Up to 37% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-2500K - $1.32 vs $2.08 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 1700X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD YD170XBCAEWOF Ryzen 7 1700X Processor
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
INTEL Core i5-2500K Processor - BX80623i52500K
Buy for €243.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 1700X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.