Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2420 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $142.59 vs $320.62
- Up to 52% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-14900K - $0.59 vs $1.23 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 7 1700 - 289 vs 267 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
267
92.38754325259517%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
47.96747967479675%
Price, €
€355.89
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €355.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1005
32.40890035472429%
Multi-Core
5100
24.285714285714285%
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |