Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1155 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Starfield than Ryzen 7 1700 - 59 vs 52 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $76.77 vs $142.59
- Up to 53% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 7 1700 - $1.44 vs $3.04 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
52
88.13559322033898%
Value, €/FPS
€3.04/FPS
47.368421052631575%
Price, €
€158.27
53%
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
59
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €85.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1005
69.88873435326843%
Multi-Core
5100
88.68022952529995%
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |