Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 548 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 6% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 7 1700 - 167 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $73.12 vs $142.59
- Up to 51% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 7 1700 - $0.49 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10392 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |