Buy on Amazon
€158.27
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 397 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G4900 - 124 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $21.41 vs $142.59
- Up to 84% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 1700 - $0.2 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
AMD YD1700BBAEBOX Ryzen 7 1700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
118
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€23.77
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for €23.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.