Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2250 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 120 vs 100 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 5600X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Vermeer | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 135 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
