Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 3504 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1280 - 144 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 5 5600X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Xeon E3-1280
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1280 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
| Vermeer | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
